Publishing in peer-reviewed journals. Fundamentals for new investigators.
نویسنده
چکیده
According to statistics recently compiled by Aldrich et al. (l), in 1989 and in 1990 a total of 406 individuals received their PhD degrees in areas represented by the American Physiological Society. The majority of these individuals have started their careers in the academic, federal, or private sectors and have assumed professional responsibilities that include the communication of their scientific knowledge to students, staffs, colleagues, or superiors. Inherent with these responsibilities is an obligation to the physiology community to share this information to advance and to improve our understanding and awareness of physiological processes and mechanisms. The best way to fulfill this responsibility is to publish in scientific reviewed journals. Publishing in peerreviewed journals is not only altruistic for the advancement of physiology, it is essential for successful grantsmanship, peer recognition, academic or job promotions, prestigious invitations, and for the obtainment of full membership within APS. Unfortunately, few individuals who have recently been awarded their PhD degrees have also received information concerning the fundamentals of publishing in peer-reviewed journals. This article, which was a presenta-
منابع مشابه
A Study of Innovative Features in Scholarly Open Access Journals
BACKGROUND The emergence of the Internet has triggered tremendous changes in the publication of scientific peer-reviewed journals. Today, journals are usually available in parallel electronic versions, but the way the peer-review process works, the look of articles and journals, and the rigid and slow publication schedules have remained largely unchanged, at least for the vast majority of subsc...
متن کاملPeer review in open access scientific journals
journals has revolutionized scientific publishing. Open access to medical publications has the potential to boost the timely and widespread dissemination of new research findings and, ultimately, to have a more immediate impact on clinical practice than traditional publishing methods. However, several aspects of open access publishing remain to be discussed and clarified by the scientific commu...
متن کاملScholarly communication in the digital environment: what do authors want?
Executive summary This report summarises the key findings of a large-scale survey of journal authors' opinions, possibly the largest such survey ever carried out. We report here the views and attitudes of nearly 4,000 senior researchers from 97 countries in relation to what they want from the journals system at a time of change and uncertainty. There is no longer any doubt that the journals cri...
متن کاملThe publishing delay in scholarly peer-reviewed journals
Publishing in scholarly peer reviewed journals usually entails long delays from submission to publication. In part this is due to the length of the peer review process and in part because of the dominating tradition of publication in issues, earlier a necessity of paper‐based publishing, which creates backlogs of manuscripts waiting in line. The delays slow the dissemination of scholarship and ...
متن کاملWriting for Research Publications
Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals [1] (Consensus standards by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors for editors, authors, and publishers of biomedical journals.) Review Criteria for Research Reports [2] (Task Force report that presents and explains standards for research articles-for reviewers and authors.) Publish, Not Perish: Art & Craft of...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- The Physiologist
دوره 34 5 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1991